Pipeline Freespan Mitigation
Monday, February 15, 2016Pipeline freespans are at risk from damage by one of two distinct mechanisms: by excessive bending from externally applied hydrodynamic or self weight loading, or by long term fatigue damage, from flow induced vibrations.
The traditional means of ensuring
that excessive bending deformation cannot occur is to define a maximum
allowable freespan length such that the maximum equivalent stress in the
freespan is less than an acceptable fraction of the pipeline steel's yield
stress.
Traditionally, Vortex Shedding
Induced Vibrations (VIV) of freespans is not allowed to occur at any time
during the design life of a pipeline system. In recent years a less stringent
approach has become acceptable, in which VIV has been allowed provided it is
demonstrated that the allowable fatigue damage is not exceeded.
Spans that are found to be
critical with respect to VIV are usually corrected by placing rock berms below
the pipe in order to shorten the span lengths and thus increase the natural frequency
of the spans. In addition to the cost implication of placing a large number of
rock berms on the seabed, the main disadvantage of this approach is that feed
in of expansion into the spans will be restricted.
Design criteria applicable to
different environmental conditions have been defined as follow:
- Peak stresses or moment under extreme condition will satisfy the dynamic strength criteria
- For first criteria verified, a fatigue analysis will be performed.
- The fatigue damage shall not exceed the allowable fatigue damage, r|, that is normally 0.1.
--
Source:
Bai, Yong and Bai, Qiang. Subsea Pipelines And Risers. USA: Elsevier Inc. 2005.
http://www.ogj.com/articles/print/volume-93/issue-8/in-this-issue/pipeline/freespan-analysis-correction-method-saves-time-on-north-sea-project.html
0 komentar